Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

  1. #1

    Default comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    I am finding that in my playing I am reaching a plateau. But I don't think its me. I'm completing my second round through Mr. Grismans "Dawg Mandolin" from Homespun tapes, and I am finding that playing these tunes on my friends' $K++! Collings F5 is (obviously) way easier than it is to play these difficult tunes/melodies/phrases on my 50 dollar cheapo. In it's defense I had a pro set this one up and it plays great!... (for a cheap mandolin that I had to remove the top 11 frets from, in order to use the bottom 13...yeah, but it plays nicely now. it was still noticeably easier on a low end Kentucky. but why? why cant I hit three notes in a row on the cheapo? what gives the nice ones the sustain? stiffness of the neck , hardness of materials, workmanship,quality of wood, grain orientation, shape of stiffeners in the body, or a combination? or is that the quest of all luthiers ...to figure that out...tone and sustain ...etc? I have to pick almost every note. While on the Collings I can "play it right".
    Why can't my cheapo mando keep up with these faster/ more complex phrases?

  2. #2

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    "Responsiveness" is a vague term that I use in this case. "Playability" is easily measured with metrics like string height, bridge placement, string gauge, scale length, etc. But "responsiveness" is a little harder to describe. A well-crafted instrument goes beyond simple playability and provides a musical tool that allows you to stretch your legs.
    It's the sum of all the pieces that went into the construction, and every element is an essential part of the system. The most important component of a good mandolin is not the wood species, weight of the tailpiece, placement of the tone bars, etc. It's the builder's care.

  3. The following members say thank you to Marty Jacobson for this post:


  4. #3
    Registered User sunburst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    15,888

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    You've just laid out the questions that started me on my "quest" to learn what makes a good instrument good and a great instrument great. It is what started me repairing, modifying, and eventually building instruments.
    My advice; don't try to figure it out, you might become a luthier. Keep your day job (especially if you get a regular pay check and benefits(!!)), save your money and buy the best mandolin you can afford, enjoy it's tone and playability and remain blissfully ignorant of all the details of construction that make it the great mandolin that it is.

    Alternatively, you can dive into these questions and spend the rest of your life trying to fully understand it all.
    Last edited by sunburst; Dec-16-2013 at 4:03pm.

  5. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sunburst For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Registered User David Houchens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    North Garden,Va
    Posts
    1,610

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    John, why didn't you tell me that back in "96"? Just Kidding. Its been a long fun ride. Thanks For letting me pick your brain all those years. Oh yeah, I probably ain't done pickin yet.

  7. #5
    Innocent Bystander JeffD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    24,807
    Blog Entries
    56

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    Quote Originally Posted by mando farmer View Post
    Why can't my cheapo mando keep up with these faster/ more complex phrases?
    Cuz its a cheapo.

    A talent for trivializin' the momentous and complicatin' the obvious.

    The entire staff
    funny....

  8. The following members say thank you to JeffD for this post:


  9. #6
    Registered User sunburst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    15,888

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    Tried to tell ya, David...

  10. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Gilbertsville. New York
    Posts
    1,842

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    You might try the opposite and see how your friend sounds playing your mandolin.

    Since you can make the $75 mandolin sound better by performing a luthier done eleven fret fretectomy on it, Why not try the same thing on his? If his sounds great now, with all its frets, just think how much better his will play with only 13 frets! Do it as a surprise. He will love you for it. He might even want to trade!
    Bart McNeil

  11. The following members say thank you to bmac for this post:


  12. #8
    working for the mando.... Bluetickhound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Peachtree City, Ga (aka, the bubble)
    Posts
    682

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    Ha! If only I could... i just have this compulsive nature that is forcing me to single handedly keep folks like StewMac and Roger Siminoff (among several others...) in business....

    Edit: That was in reply to post #3

  13. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    169

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    There in lies the danger of buying something really cheap to begin on. It's hard to play, hard to keep in tune and doesn't sound very good. It is easy to see why folks give up. You now realize there is a big difference in instruments. Get the best mandolin you can afford and play it the best you can.

  14. The following members say thank you to Bluejay for this post:


  15. #10
    Tony Bare
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Lizella Ga
    Posts
    520

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    Don't worry about it. Find something with a solid top. An A style carved top or flat top won't break the bank if you can find a used one. You don't have to spend thousands for something learn on. You just need something with good level frets and a straight neck with a good set up. Put back a few bucks every week and by the time you outgrow what you are playing you will have saved enough to upgrade. Then you will get MAS and the real trouble will begin.
    Tony Bare

  16. The following members say thank you to mandolinplucker for this post:


  17. #11
    Registered User fscotte's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Zanesville, Ohio
    Posts
    2,490

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    Cause you're not playing with a Bluechip pick!

  18. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Gilbertsville. New York
    Posts
    1,842

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    I agree with the cheap new instruments will never improve in tone.

    However cheap but old and beat up quality instruments are surprisingly easy to repair and can often return to good playability and good sound with a surprisingly small amount of work.
    Bart McNeil

  19. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    4,881

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    I have often why some of these factory builders even make an "el-cheapo" when it wouldn`t take very much more time to make them real good and get more money for them...I understand that some of the hardware and materials are inferior to the top of the line mandolins but getting good materials shouldn`t be a huge problem...I`ve heard it said that a Gibson made Flatiron Festival is 99% the same mandolin as a Gibson made F-5G, why? the F-5G could bring in almost twice as much money as the Festival model....

    I`m sure there must be a reason but I don`t know it....

    Willie

  20. #14
    Chu Dat Frawg Eric C.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    621

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Willie View Post
    I have often why some of these factory builders even make an "el-cheapo" when it wouldn`t take very much more time to make them real good and get more money for them...I understand that some of the hardware and materials are inferior to the top of the line mandolins but getting good materials shouldn`t be a huge problem...I`ve heard it said that a Gibson made Flatiron Festival is 99% the same mandolin as a Gibson made F-5G, why? the F-5G could bring in almost twice as much money as the Festival model....

    I`m sure there must be a reason but I don`t know it....

    Willie
    Not everyone can afford an F-5G (probably the majority of us) but could probably afford the Flatiron. It makes no sense to only build the top end instruments only to have most of them sit in inventory unsold when they would probably sell 5 flatirons per F-5G made.

  21. #15

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    Quote Originally Posted by Willie View Post
    I have often why some of these factory builders even make an "el-cheapo" when it wouldn`t take very much more time to make them real good and get more money for them...I understand that some of the hardware and materials are inferior to the top of the line mandolins but getting good materials shouldn`t be a huge problem...I`ve heard it said that a Gibson made Flatiron Festival is 99% the same mandolin as a Gibson made F-5G, why? the F-5G could bring in almost twice as much money as the Festival model....

    I`m sure there must be a reason but I don`t know it....

    Willie
    If they are 99% equivalent, then that's a serious case of brand-name-on-the-headstock markup.

    Mandofarmer, with most products, the concept of "diminishing returns" is very much at play. The more money that you throw at something, the less drastic of a change it will make to the overall quality. From a $100 to $500 instrument, you'll see drastic improvements in quality. From $1K to $2K, there will be noticeable improvement, but less so. From $5K to $10K, improvement will be less discernible, and you gotta wonder how much you're actually getting out of your purchase, and in the case of mandolins, it's especially important to discern between cosmetic and structural/tonal differences.

    Most consumers will want the most bang for their buck, so a good ratio of quality per dollar is highly sought after, sometimes more so than just quality alone. You'll find a lot of great instruments with solid, carved woods for not much more than your current mandolin. Eastman and Kentucky are often noted as great archtop mandolins in the lower ranges (the Breedlove Crossover is laminate back & sides but Breedloves have excellent playability), and you can find many great flat-top or travel mandos in that range as well. Red Line, Big Muddy/Mid Mo, and others offer great-value flattops.

    --Tom

  22. #16
    Registered User sunburst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    15,888

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Coletti View Post
    ...Most consumers will want the most bang for their buck, so a good ratio of quality per dollar is highly sought after, sometimes more so than just quality alone...
    As long as it has points and scrolls.

  23. #17
    Registered User Steve Sorensen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Santa Clarita, CA
    Posts
    2,465

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    You've got one life to live. Every day you spend playing an instrument that doesn't thrill you is a day lost that you will never get back.

    Steve
    Steve Sorensen
    Sorensen Mandolin & Guitar Co.
    www.sorensenstrings.com

  24. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Gilbertsville. New York
    Posts
    1,842

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    Quote Originally Posted by StevenS View Post
    You've got one life to live. Every day you spend playing an instrument that doesn't thrill you is a day lost that you will never get back.

    Steve
    Oh, sorry, for a minute I thought you were speaking of my wife....
    Bart McNeil

  25. #19
    but that's just me Bertram Henze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    0.8 mpc from NGC224, upstairs
    Posts
    10,075

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    Quote Originally Posted by mando farmer View Post
    I had a pro set this one up and it plays great!... (for a cheap mandolin that I had to remove the top 11 frets from, in order to use the bottom 13...yeah, but it plays nicely now.
    Let's put this in perspective: you have got a tractor and had it set up to be the best tractor around - but still you can't win a race at Indianapolis with it?
    the world is better off without bad ideas, good ideas are better off without the world

  26. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Edmonds, WA
    Posts
    446

    Default Re: comparing quailty of instruments: why cant my cheapo keep up?

    Mandofarmer, you are exhibit A in my theory that it's fine for a beginner to start on a fifty dollar Rogue. For less than the cost of a couple of lessons you have found that you enjoy playing the mandolin and you have learned to differentiate and appreciate the different characteristics of different instruments.

    It is now time to define your budget and go shopping. MAS begins. :-)

    Rob

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •