Hey all,
Since getting back into mandolins in the last couple weeks I have been reading about and looking at pics from all sorts of brands. I am happy to see so many great choices out there for those of us that cannot spend $1,500 for a mandolin. It seems that models from each of these are very highly thought of. That's what I wanted to ask about.
In each of these brands I can find a mandolin, or several, that I really like and wouldn't mind having at a future time. I like both A and F styles although I have never owned or played an A.
I am curious to know what makes one of these brands better or more desirous than the others? Just from someone that hasn't been involved in mandos for the last several years and has just recently came back here, it looks like the Eastman mandos are the most respected of the "lower cost" lot. Would that be a correct assumption? Why are they more highly thought of than the JBovier or The Loar mandos? Does Eastman use better materials? Do they have better craftsmen? What is it? Or..am I totally misreading it?
Lets say that I have a limit of $1,000. We look at all these brands that sell these all wood affordable mandolins. If we have an example from each of them that come in under the target price, is there one that would be better than all the others? Would the Eastman 615 be better than the comparable priced JBovier, Kentucky or The Loar?
Are there differences in the price points of mandolins in each of these brands? Both A and F style mandolins?
I forgot to add Breedlove to my list. I like those mandolins too.
Or...are there really no meaningful differences in these various brands of mandolins and it all boils down to how it looks, feels and sounds to YOU at the time you are buying?
I'm really curious about this and would like to know what you all think. Should I, and others, be focusing on one or 2 brands of mando if we want the better made and sounding mandolins, or are all of them equally great or darn close to it?
Thank you for the time.
nalajr
Bookmarks