Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 78

Thread: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

  1. #51
    Oval holes are cool David Lewis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,483

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    Have a Washburn M1SLD. Needs a fret job but is lovely and an Epiphone mm40L which I think is a special instrument.

  2. The following members say thank you to David Lewis for this post:


  3. #52

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cochiti Don View Post
    Love my Collings MTO
    Every MTO I've ever played was a lovely engaging instrument. Once Played one in cream that left me salivating.
    Silverangel A
    Arches F style kit
    1913 Gibson A-1

  4. #53
    coprolite mandroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Outer Spiral Arm, of Galaxy, NW Oregon.
    Posts
    17,123

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    I like my 1922 A4, (F4 minus some blocks of wood, & several thousand dollars) enough
    since I got it that it is in a repair queue waiting for a refret.



    writing about music
    is like dancing,
    about architecture

  5. #54
    ===========
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    1,628

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    Quote Originally Posted by David Lewis View Post
    Have a Washburn M1SLD. Needs a fret job but is lovely and an Epiphone mm40L which I think is a special instrument.
    My M1SDL is also a nice instrument - a great player. It is also nice to hear some words about the Epi MM40L - even after all this time, I still see very little first-hand information on the internet. Thanks!

  6. #55

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    I've got two oval hole As. One is Lafferty LA-2 which has such modern appointments as the long neck, radiused board, and an elevated fretboard. The tone is still A-ish but edgy to a certain extent. My other is a Breedlove Premier 00. It too has the modern neck, radius, and elevated extension. The tone on this is sweeter softer, and has a delicate reverb quality. I use the Lafferty when I need more edge and cut, and the Breedlove when I am after sweetness.

    I am awaiting a 1921 Gibson A. I haven't seen or heard it yet. I'll know tomorrow.

  7. #56
    Mando-Accumulator Jim Garber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    30,761

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    I just saw this Red Diamond A Oval on the Carter Vintage site. I am sure that is sounds wonderful. I assume it is a hybrid with a longer neck. Doesn't it look a bit odd with that soundhole so high on the top?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	MN1100_1024x1024.jpg 
Views:	96 
Size:	83.9 KB 
ID:	166682
    Jim

    My Stream on Soundcloud
    Facebook
    19th Century Tunes
    Playing lately:
    1924 Gibson A4 - 2018 Campanella A-5 - 2007 Brentrup A4C - 1915 Frank Merwin Ashley violin - Huss & Dalton DS - 1923 Gibson A2 black snakehead - '83 Flatiron A5-2 - 1939 Gibson L-00 - 1936 Epiphone Deluxe - 1928 Gibson L-5 - ca. 1890s Fairbanks Senator Banjo - ca. 1923 Vega Style M tenor banjo - ca. 1920 Weymann Style 25 Mandolin-Banjo - National RM-1

  8. #57
    Registered User Charles E.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Saint Augustine Beach FL
    Posts
    6,649

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    I agree Jim, that just looks wrong.
    Charley

    A bunch of stuff with four strings

  9. #58
    Registered User Charles E.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Saint Augustine Beach FL
    Posts
    6,649

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    This however looks just right.........

    https://www.mandolincafe.com/ads/121420#121420

    If I only had the coin.

    NFI
    Charley

    A bunch of stuff with four strings

  10. #59

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    I had a Red Diamond A4 a few years ago - looks the same:
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0070.jpg 
Views:	84 
Size:	371.5 KB 
ID:	166686   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0069.jpg 
Views:	94 
Size:	549.4 KB 
ID:	166687   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0066.jpg 
Views:	78 
Size:	501.0 KB 
ID:	166688  

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0065.jpg 
Views:	150 
Size:	578.1 KB 
ID:	166689  

  11. #60
    Mando-Accumulator Jim Garber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    30,761

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    Quote Originally Posted by Charles E. View Post
    This however looks just right.........

    https://www.mandolincafe.com/ads/121420#121420

    If I only had the coin.

    NFI
    Agree 100%.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	121420.jpg 
Views:	83 
Size:	153.1 KB 
ID:	166693
    Jim

    My Stream on Soundcloud
    Facebook
    19th Century Tunes
    Playing lately:
    1924 Gibson A4 - 2018 Campanella A-5 - 2007 Brentrup A4C - 1915 Frank Merwin Ashley violin - Huss & Dalton DS - 1923 Gibson A2 black snakehead - '83 Flatiron A5-2 - 1939 Gibson L-00 - 1936 Epiphone Deluxe - 1928 Gibson L-5 - ca. 1890s Fairbanks Senator Banjo - ca. 1923 Vega Style M tenor banjo - ca. 1920 Weymann Style 25 Mandolin-Banjo - National RM-1

  12. #61

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Garber View Post
    Doesn't it look a bit odd with that soundhole so high on the top?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	MN1100_1024x1024.jpg 
Views:	96 
Size:	83.9 KB 
ID:	166682
    Quote Originally Posted by Dacraw54 View Post
    I had a Red Diamond A4 a few years ago - looks the same:

    https://www.mandolincafe.com/forum/a...9&d=1523323232
    Can't figure out how to display Dacraw54's Red Diamond for a side-by-side but the difference seems to be in the visual impact the Rosette makes. Soundholes appear to be in the same spots.

    As an aside, I have 12-fret and 14-fret mandolins and it's interesting that the 2 frets do make a noticeable playing difference. I prefer the 12 and feel like I'm really reaching when I pick up my 14.
    VerneAndru.com | oKee.ComX

    - ---==< V >==--- -

  13. #62
    ===========
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    1,628

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    Quote Originally Posted by Verne Andru View Post
    Can't figure out how to display Dacraw54's Red Diamond for a side-by-side but the difference seems to be in the visual impact the Rosette makes. Soundholes appear to be in the same spots.
    Here is the side-by-side . . . and it looks like Verne is right about the rosette.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RedCombo.jpg 
Views:	92 
Size:	409.0 KB 
ID:	166696

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MikeZito For This Useful Post:


  15. #63
    Registered User QCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Pacifica, Calif.
    Posts
    90

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    I have one of each. My F5 is a BRW blacktop. My F4 is a Pomeroy. While i really like the sound I get out of the F5, the Pomeroy has become my daily player. I just prefer the full, balanced tone I get with it. Perfect for what I call "kitchen picking' and singing". More people ask to play the F4 than the 5, go figure.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2136.JPG 
Views:	116 
Size:	133.6 KB 
ID:	166704  

  16. The following members say thank you to QCS for this post:


  17. #64

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tobin View Post
    I go through phases where I like the looks of my F4 better than my F5. Once you stare at an F4 long enough, it just looks "right" and the F5 looks strange. But then I swing back to the F5.

    I do admit, though, that I always prefer my F5 sound over the F4.
    Hi Tobin. I feel the same. I've always thought that a Gibson F4 with that rope rosette adding to it is the best looking mandolin of all. 1917 to early 1918 when they first started sunburst as opposed to just shaded top like thr 1915 and 1916 ones and they still had Handel tuner buttons.

    I have to say the F5 always 'does the job' when playing with other instruments but the F4 played at home is a joy.

    I'm just thinking of having one made as the Gibson ones are now very expensive. I know someone who can do a beautiful. F4. I've had 7 Gibson F4s over the years but always sold them for various reasons.

    regards

    Jimmy
    UK

  18. #65
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    3,563

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    For Bluegrass and double stops I still prefer an A5 or F5 but just sitting around the house playing old time, Celtic or anything with no double stops I prefer an oval ! I have a Girouard F4 on order to be born late 2019 ! My Girouard A oval is lonely !

  19. The following members say thank you to yankees1 for this post:


  20. #66
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Jackson, CA
    Posts
    208

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    It's just my theory but I think there might be some truth to it, so here it is...

    There's an eccentricity in the roundness of the Florentine mandolins that is on the same axis as the neck. When you look at an F5 the F-holes reinforce that eccentricity or imbalance by flowing on a parallel axis. Whereas the oval-hole of most F4s counterbalances the existing eccentricity by orienting the hole's eccentric axis at a right angle, thereby increasing balance.

    oh well, maybe I'll just stick to pickin'
    Blessings

  21. #67

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    I only just started learning about oval holes due to a recent interest in classical music for the mando.

    I bought an Eastman MD604 to start. And I have warmed to it, took a while to learn to play it properly for the sound it makes. At this point, I find I prefer it's darker sound to the F-hole, it has a lot more low end. But in a bluegrass jam it wouldn't cut through, so the F-Hole is for that.

    FYI I played on a bunch of oval holes at Gryphon recently and the (owner?) gave me the talk (and let me play) MTO's and F4's. He said they are hybrids, with body shapes and neck/fingerboards closer to an F-hole, but an oval hole top. This gives them a sound somewhere in-between a traditional oval hole design (such as the Eastman), and a traditional F-hole.

    They were beautiful instruments and you could hear that they were exactly what he said they were.

    I for one was wanting something for classical music, so the darker more-sustained sound of a traditional oval-hole comes closer for me.

    My next little experiment is with a flat-top oval-hole pancake (from Red Valley), which are supposed to have even more sustain (and less punch). Flat-tops are relatively inexpensive, so easier to play around there with custom builds too (nut width and neck).

    Eventually there may be a bowlback (expensive) in my future, but I need to finish learning exactly what I like in an instrument first as it will likely be special ordered from somewhere in europe.
    Davey Stuart tenor guitar (based on his 18" mandola design).
    Eastman MD-604SB with Grover 309 tuners.
    Eastwood 4 string electric mandostang, 2x Airline e-mandola (4-string) one strung as an e-OM.
    DSP's: Helix HX Stomp, various Zooms.
    Amps: THR-10, Sony XB-20.

  22. The following members say thank you to kurth83 for this post:


  23. #68
    Still Picking and Sawing Jack Roberts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    sigmaX>=hbar/2sigmaP
    Posts
    1,701

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    The best money I ever spent in my life was a wedding ring for my wife. Second best was my F
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F4_22227.jpg 
Views:	109 
Size:	532.5 KB 
ID:	173403  
    Last edited by Jack Roberts; Dec-14-2018 at 4:48pm.
    Ha, ha! keep time: how sour sweet music is,
    When time is broke and no proportion kept!
    --William Shakespeare

  24. The following members say thank you to Jack Roberts for this post:


  25. #69
    Registered User Joey Anchors's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,008

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    I love Oval-Holes as I play jazz and blues. Love the shorter neck and everything about them
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	829EFA8F-3BBD-4626-B299-9D1E2D27488F.jpeg 
Views:	72 
Size:	132.6 KB 
ID:	173416
    Waterloo WL-M

    Blues Mando Social Group - member

  26. #70
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    3,563

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    I love ovals but longer necks !

  27. #71
    coprolite mandroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Outer Spiral Arm, of Galaxy, NW Oregon.
    Posts
    17,123

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    A4, Wood, 92 years old & A5. Carbon fiber not that old... Both got refretted in last 2 years ..
    writing about music
    is like dancing,
    about architecture

  28. The following members say thank you to mandroid for this post:


  29. #72

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    I tried this Pava A4 out yesterday. Gorgeous sound and appearance, the pics don't do it justice. Someone please buy it before I dip into my kid's college fund. Different flavor than my A5, as you A4 afficiandos would expect, it has me reconsidering the need for just one mandolin. NFI

    https://www.mandolincafe.com/ads/131954#131954

    And speaking of gorgeous, also in the classifieds:

    https://themusicemporium.com/mandoli...ney-amber.7268

    I think I may have a problem.

  30. #73
    Registered User Hendrik Ahrend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Leer, Northern Germany
    Posts
    1,555

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    Here are two pics of my 1923 F4 and 1924 F5; I love them both, although the F4 does look particularly nice IMHO.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C46F28C7-716A-4B22-BBA6-227A9372D828.jpg 
Views:	93 
Size:	657.9 KB 
ID:	173589
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	AF4B2986-9BD2-47B8-A36A-855E885D78A5.jpg 
Views:	86 
Size:	564.9 KB 
ID:	173590

  31. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hendrik Ahrend For This Useful Post:


  32. #74
    Registered User seankeegan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    East Coast of Ireland
    Posts
    246

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    I prefer ovals. As does Santa

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	41097946_10156339217735973_6925947150656339968_o.jpg 
Views:	84 
Size:	105.5 KB 
ID:	173591

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2c32cd203f9ab5a92e7e0def9d632abd.jpg 
Views:	79 
Size:	34.6 KB 
ID:	173592

    Merry Christmas to all.

  33. #75

    Default Re: F4 vs F5; or, how do you like your oval holes?

    Quote Originally Posted by seankeegan View Post
    I prefer ovals. As does Santa

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	41097946_10156339217735973_6925947150656339968_o.jpg 
Views:	84 
Size:	105.5 KB 
ID:	173591

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2c32cd203f9ab5a92e7e0def9d632abd.jpg 
Views:	79 
Size:	34.6 KB 
ID:	173592

    Merry Christmas to all.
    Nice. How well do you find the GK pickup works on that mando second from the right?
    VerneAndru.com | oKee.ComX

    - ---==< V >==--- -

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •