Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Update on 1972 Gibson F5 rebuild:

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Cape Cod, Ma.
    Posts
    105

    Default Update on 1972 Gibson F5 rebuild:

    Greetings, You may have recalled back aroun last November that I was asked to replace the rotted binding on a 1972 F5. It ended up being a total cosmetic rebuild.

    I cut out the original bindings, only to find that the top had nearly separated from the rim.... so that got glued back down but not before I checked inside to make sure the tone bars were intact. They were, but they were also huge. We chose not to mess with any regraduation or changing of the bars, partially because of expense and partially because my client likes how his mando sounds.

    Neck joint and angle were fine, finish was definitely lacquer and it was flaking off of the top, so we went with a total stripping/refinishing. You will see in the pictures that the original finish was very dark and the back/side grain was almost totally obscured.

    I went with the Royal-Lac finish. It's a shellac based varnish with some added resins/secret sauce that makes the finish more resistant to alcohol, sweat, etc...after a sufficient cure time (month) it polishes really nicely and can be wet sanded.

    I delivered the Mandolin to its owner this week. He gasped when opening the case. Mission accomplished! (Good thing because the repair ended up costing more than he paid for it new :-). . Thank you to the folks who gave me a variety of advice on this project.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0741.jpg 
Views:	398 
Size:	830.0 KB 
ID:	160379   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0742.jpg 
Views:	386 
Size:	406.2 KB 
ID:	160380   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0743.JPG 
Views:	367 
Size:	934.7 KB 
ID:	160381  

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0748.JPG 
Views:	365 
Size:	1.10 MB 
ID:	160382   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0199.jpg 
Views:	382 
Size:	343.6 KB 
ID:	160383   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0201.jpg 
Views:	363 
Size:	448.5 KB 
ID:	160384  


  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Karl Hoyt For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Cape Cod, Ma.
    Posts
    105

    Default Re: Update on 1972 Gibson F5 rebuild:

    This being only my third binding job on an F style instrument, I wasn't happy with my work on the scroll area, but , frankly, it was on a par with the original.... and the owner is ecstatic.... :-)

  4. #3
    Registered User Timbofood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI.
    Posts
    7,487

    Default Re: Update on 1972 Gibson F5 rebuild:

    Superior to any of my work! Unless it's binding a chicken for grilling!
    Timothy F. Lewis
    "If brains was lard, that boy couldn't grease a very big skillet" J.D. Clampett

  5. The following members say thank you to Timbofood for this post:


  6. #4
    Registered User CWRoyds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    San Rafael, Ca
    Posts
    700

    Default Re: Update on 1972 Gibson F5 rebuild:

    It is a shame you didn't get to trim down the tone bars, etc.
    I bet it would have made it far superior in tone.
    How did it sound to you?
    Mandolins: Northfield 5-Bar Artist Model "Old Dog", J Bovier F5 Special, Gibson A-00 (1940)
    Fiddles: 1920s Strad copy, 1930s Strad copy, Liu Xi T20, Liu Xi T19+ Dark.
    Guitars: Taylor 514c (1995), Gibson Southern Jumbo (1940s), Gibson L-48 (1940s), Les Paul Custom (1978), Fender Strat (Black/RWFB) (1984), Fender Strat (Candy Apple Red/MFB) (1985).
    Sitars: Hiren Roy KP (1980s), Naskar (1970s), Naskar (1960s).
    Misc: 8 Course Lute (L.K.Brown)

  7. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Cape Cod, Ma.
    Posts
    105

    Default Re: Update on 1972 Gibson F5 rebuild:

    Quote Originally Posted by CWRoyds View Post
    It is a shame you didn't get to trim down the tone bars, etc.
    I bet it would have made it far superior in tone.
    How did it sound to you?
    I thought long and hard about it , CW: But I'm a mandolin rookie, (though I've built all kinds of stringed instruments nice 1978) and this being a customer's mandolin, I talked with him about it and ultimately chose not to mess with it: He has an old Gibson A that he mostly plays, and this one is a cannon compared to his A and he loves the sound as-is... so we left well enough alone.

    I had my first two mandolins strung up at the same time Gibson was: Both of mine had a better bass response and were a bit louder than this particular Gibson. So, I was very happy with the mandolins I built and disappointed with the Gibson: But my understanding is that the early 70's were dismal years for the F5. My customer has always loved his, and that's all that counts, ultimately.

    Karl
    Last edited by Karl Hoyt; Aug-31-2017 at 9:33pm.

  8. #6
    Registered User CWRoyds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    San Rafael, Ca
    Posts
    700

    Default Re: Update on 1972 Gibson F5 rebuild:

    Well, in the end, it is his mandolin, so I am glad he is happy.
    From what I gather from this forum, most of those 70s Gibsons need some serious scraping and tweaking to reach adequate potential.
    I find it hard to own an instrument that has a potential that is not reached because of a fixable problem.

    I had my mandolin worked on by Stephen Perry, who did his mandovoodoo on it.
    I knew it could be better than it was.
    You could just feel it when you played it.
    It came back SO much better in tone, warmth, volume, and is a much more satisfying instrument now.
    And that was from fairly minor scraping and tweaking.
    It made me want to send my guitars in for the same treatment, and maybe my fiddle.

    To each his own, as they say.
    Like I said, I am glad he is thrilled.
    It does look rather nice with the new finish.
    Certainly the binding needed to be fixed.

    Personally, I would have spent the money on the tone bars etc, and left the finish the way it was.
    I would rather have the tone and the bling.
    Mandolins: Northfield 5-Bar Artist Model "Old Dog", J Bovier F5 Special, Gibson A-00 (1940)
    Fiddles: 1920s Strad copy, 1930s Strad copy, Liu Xi T20, Liu Xi T19+ Dark.
    Guitars: Taylor 514c (1995), Gibson Southern Jumbo (1940s), Gibson L-48 (1940s), Les Paul Custom (1978), Fender Strat (Black/RWFB) (1984), Fender Strat (Candy Apple Red/MFB) (1985).
    Sitars: Hiren Roy KP (1980s), Naskar (1970s), Naskar (1960s).
    Misc: 8 Course Lute (L.K.Brown)

  9. The following members say thank you to CWRoyds for this post:


  10. #7
    Certified! Bernie Daniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    8,347
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: Update on 1972 Gibson F5 rebuild:

    Beautiful repair and re-finish! Personally if I did it (and it were my mandolin) I'd have replaced the binding, shaved the tone bars and maybe re-graudated it --if it needed it -- and mostly left the "natural distressed" look!

    But the owner is the boss and you did an awesome job!
    Bernie
    ____
    Due to current budgetary restrictions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off -- sorry about the inconvenience.

  11. The following members say thank you to Bernie Daniel for this post:


  12. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Cape Cod, Ma.
    Posts
    105

    Default Re: Update on 1972 Gibson F5 rebuild:

    Quote Originally Posted by Bernie Daniel View Post
    Beautiful repair and re-finish! Personally if I did it (and it were my mandolin) I'd have replaced the binding, shaved the tone bars and maybe re-graudated it --if it needed it -- and mostly left the "natural distressed" look!

    But the owner is the boss and you did an awesome job!
    Thank you , Sir. We originally talked about replacing the binding only and leaving it distressed......but there ended up being a fair amount of chipping on the sides, so ultimately we ended up deciding on a refinish. I'm inclined to agree with you, if it were mine, I would have popped the back off and do as you suggested. But I'm a relative rookie to the inner workings of these little boxes and didn't want to mess with a customer's instrument. As I said, he already loved the sound of his mando.... so it was all good!

    Thanks again: Karl

  13. #9
    Registered User Ivan Kelsall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Manchester - Lancashire - NW England
    Posts
    14,187

    Default Re: Update on 1972 Gibson F5 rebuild:

    Beautiful work there Karl. No wonder the owner was pleased with it,the original binding was a real horror story. How did the re-fiished mandolin sound compared to it's 'original' finish ?. Was there any discenable difference in tone ?. As you pointed out,the owner liked the tone as it was,so,best left alone - one man's improvement is another man's disaster !!.

    You brought out the grain on the neck & the back very nicely indeed,
    Ivan
    Weber F-5 'Fern'.
    Lebeda F-5 "Special".
    Stelling Bellflower BANJO
    Tokai - 'Tele-alike'.
    Ellis DeLuxe "A" style.

  14. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Cape Cod, Ma.
    Posts
    105

    Default Re: Update on 1972 Gibson F5 rebuild:

    Quote Originally Posted by Ivan Kelsall View Post
    Beautiful work there Karl. No wonder the owner was pleased with it,the original binding was a real horror story. How did the re-fiished mandolin sound compared to it's 'original' finish ?. Was there any discenable difference in tone ?. As you pointed out,the owner liked the tone as it was,so,best left alone - one man's improvement is another man's disaster !!.

    You brought out the grain on the neck & the back very nicely indeed,
    Ivan
    Thank you, sir. Unfortunately, prior to the refinish it was so rickety that I couldn't string it up... The finish I ended up with was definitely thinner than the original lacquer finish.... I used that Royal-Lac bodied shellac. Nice stuff!. They had gooped up the original finish with opaque brown... no personality to the original finish, so doing a lightly wiped stain, then air brushing a bit more to even out the burst.. followed by the clear coat. I was pretty happy with it, and the customer was VERY happy with it, so that's all that matters.

    Thanks again

    Karl

  15. The following members say thank you to Karl Hoyt for this post:


Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •