Re: Very fancy bowlback mandoliin in great shape—L&H?
Yeah, it looks like a Washburn; the headstock shape tends toward a later period (1910-15). How many ribs in the bowl? If it's 44, it could be the Model 275, although the side bindings aren't as elaborate as the description in Pleijsier's book (p. 147). The Model 275 has the max number of ribs described in the catalog; your headstock and fretboard inlays are like those described, as is the engraving on the tuner cover plate. Without the tailpiece cover, it's hard to match up that part with catalog descriptions, or Pleijsier's photos.
Market price? Well, almost all Washburn mandolins were labeled, and yours isn't. I wouldn't describe it as a "presentation piece"; we think of all that inlay implying top-of-the-line status, but back then, many mid-range instruments had elaborate inlay. The high number of ribs is a better indication that it was originally expensive. Would be better if it had a label, and a tailpiece cover. However, you say it's in good shape and playable, so maybe $2-250 at the high end...? It could have been made by Lyon & Healy for a dealer to resell, not as a Washburn, but similarly constructed and ornamented. We can't tell, from a distance.
I tend to guess high, but it is a nice instrument. If you're thinking of buying it, an offer under $200 might be a starting point. Antique dealers who don't usually handle mandolins (most of them) tend to think old + fancy = expensive. You could point to the large number of "antique" bowl-backs that sell on-line for $100 or less.
Good luck; let us know.
Allen Hopkins
Gibsn: '54 F5 3pt F2 A-N Custm K1 m'cello
Natl Triolian Dobro mando
Victoria b-back Merrill alumnm b-back
H-O mandolinetto
Stradolin Vega banjolin
Sobell'dola Washburn b-back'dola
Eastmn: 615'dola 805 m'cello
Flatiron 3K OM
Bookmarks