Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 26

Thread: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not starks?

  1. #1
    Timothy Tim Logan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Shutesbury, MA
    Posts
    664

    Default Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not starks?

    I am curious about this. The gauges are extremely close. Does a slight increase in guage have a disproportionate increase in tension that would be too much for the instruments? Thank you.

    Here are the guages:

    Thomastik mittels:
    .010 015 .021 .033

    Thomastik stark;
    .011 .016 .022 .034

    “There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats.” ― Albert Schweitzer

    1925 Lyon & Healy Model A, #1674
    2015 Collings A (MT2-V)

  2. #2
    Timothy Tim Logan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Shutesbury, MA
    Posts
    664

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    I am going to add some additional info from this old thread. This statement by luthier Paul Hostetter surprised me:

    https://www.mandolincafe.com/forum/t...tage-mandolins

    “Gibsons and L&H's came from the factory with the equivalent of J-74s on them. Back then there were no real choices in gauges, that's what strings were available, and your only choices were steel wrap or bronze wrap. The Gibsons and L&H's (13-7/8" and 13" scales respectively) were engineered for those gauges. I see no point to using lighter strings on them just because it's 80 years later.”

    I was very surprised to read this because I always had the impression that putting something with greater tension than the TI’s would damage an L&H arch top. So I’m a bit confused. Perhaps someone can chime in and enlighten me? Thank you!

    “There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats.” ― Albert Schweitzer

    1925 Lyon & Healy Model A, #1674
    2015 Collings A (MT2-V)

  3. #3
    Teacher, repair person
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Southeast Tennessee
    Posts
    4,078

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    I do not necessarily agree with Mr. Hostetter's statement about only one choice of string gauge being available in the old days.

    I have strung L & H's with D'addario or GHS 10 1/2 -14 -24 -38 for long periods of time with no consequences. I generally do not go more than a fraction heavier on any pre-war carved mandolins.

  4. #4
    Timothy Tim Logan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Shutesbury, MA
    Posts
    664

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    Quote Originally Posted by rcc56 View Post
    I do not necessarily agree with Mr. Hostetter's statement about only one choice of string gauge being available in the old days.

    I have strung L & H's with D'addario or GHS 10 1/2 -14 -24 -38 for long periods of time with no consequences. I generally do not go more than a fraction heavier on any pre-war carved mandolins.
    Thank you. Do you not go beyond the 10 1/2 -14 -24 -38 gauge because experience has taught you it is hazardous to an L&H? The TI starks E and A string are heavier than the gauges you set as your maximum. I wonder if this is honing in on the reason folks seem to favor TI mittels over starks? I can find no reference on the Cafe to anyone using starks by the way. As my original post says, the gauges seem remarkably close - and I wonder if that small of a gauge difference can mean a very large change in string tension?

    “There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats.” ― Albert Schweitzer

    1925 Lyon & Healy Model A, #1674
    2015 Collings A (MT2-V)

  5. #5
    NY Naturalist BradKlein's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Lehigh Valley - Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,276

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    An aside: Lyon & Healy made mandolins in both 13 7/8" and 13" scale lengths.

    I don't think you can generalize broadly about the correct string gauge for either maker. Instruments vary over the history of both. Although in general both are pretty robust instruments in my experience.
    BradKlein
    Morning Edition Host, WLVR News
    Senior Producer, Twangbox®
    Twangbox® Videos

  6. #6
    Registered User Martin Jonas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    6,431

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    Quote Originally Posted by Tim Logan View Post
    I am curious about this. The gauges are extremely close. Does a slight increase in guage have a disproportionate increase in tension that would be too much for the instruments? Thank you.

    Here are the guages:

    Thomastik mittels:
    .010 015 .021 .033

    Thomastik stark;
    .011 .016 .022 .034
    Hi Tim,

    I don't know where those gauges come from as TI don't print them on the packs. However, they do list string tensions at their official website:

    https://www.thomastik-infeld.com/en/...dolin/mandolin

    The difference in rated tension is pretty significant between the mittel and the starks. Flatwound strings can be tricky to compare as the gauge to string tension conversion is quite different compared to roundwounds.

    Martin

  7. The following members say thank you to Martin Jonas for this post:


  8. #7
    Timothy Tim Logan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Shutesbury, MA
    Posts
    664

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    Quote Originally Posted by Martin Jonas View Post
    Hi Tim,

    I don't know where those gauges come from as TI don't print them on the packs. However, they do list string tensions at their official website:

    https://www.thomastik-infeld.com/en/...dolin/mandolin

    The difference in rated tension is pretty significant between the mittel and the starks. Flatwound strings can be tricky to compare as the gauge to string tension conversion is quite different compared to roundwounds.

    Martin
    Ahhhhh.....the gauges come from StringsByMail. Here is a recap with tensions:

    Thomastik mittels:
    .010 015 .021 .033
    16.1, 14.8, 14.3, 13.2 (pounds)

    Thomastik stark;
    .011 .016 .022 .034
    17.4, 15.4, 15.4, 15.4

    The G string for example is almost a 17% increase in tension!! So I guess the remaining question is whether that is too much tension or do players just not like the sound of the starks????

    “There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats.” ― Albert Schweitzer

    1925 Lyon & Healy Model A, #1674
    2015 Collings A (MT2-V)

  9. #8
    Teacher, repair person
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Southeast Tennessee
    Posts
    4,078

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    Quote Originally Posted by Tim Logan View Post
    Thank you. Do you not go beyond the 10 1/2 -14 -24 -38 gauge because experience has taught you it is hazardous to an L&H? The TI starks E and A string are heavier than the gauges you set as your maximum. I wonder if this is honing in on the reason folks seem to favor TI mittels over starks? I can find no reference on the Cafe to anyone using starks by the way. As my original post says, the gauges seem remarkably close - and I wonder if that small of a gauge difference can mean a very large change in string tension?
    I have no experience with Thomastik strings. If the tension figures that other Cafe members have cited are accurate, their unwound strings have a slightly lower tension than the US made strings of the same diameter. Based on those figures, an L & H should be able to handle either Thomastik set.

    When I choose strings, I take into several things into account: tone, feel, what I think is reasonable tension for a particular instrument to handle, and experience with how a particular instrument responds to a choice of gauge or alloy.

    Lyon & Healy's tend to be built a little bit lighter than Gibson oval instruments. I know from experience as a player and owner that they respond well to the US strings I cited above.

    I know from experience as a repairman that some old Gibson oval hole instruments can handle just a little bit more, but tend to develop problems when strung much heavier. For old Gibsons, the absolute maximum I recommend is 11-15-25-40, and that's pushing it on some instruments. Remember, every instrument is different, and some can handle more than others, even if they were built in the same month.

    For some reason, people seem more inclined to put heavier strings on Gibson mandolins than they do on those made by Lyon and Healy.

    Some will argue with me about what these old mandolins can handle. They don't have to look a shocked customer in the eye when I tell them what the cost will be to fix a mandolin that's suffered a badly warped neck or a sunken top from being overstrung; especially when somebody on a forum told them the instrument could handle a heavy string.

  10. The following members say thank you to rcc56 for this post:


  11. #9
    Innocent Bystander JeffD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    24,807
    Blog Entries
    56

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    I use the Thomastic mittels, mostly because that is what the fellow I bought it from strongly recommended. I have not tried the stark.
    A talent for trivializin' the momentous and complicatin' the obvious.

    The entire staff
    funny....

  12. The following members say thank you to JeffD for this post:


  13. #10
    Timothy Tim Logan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Shutesbury, MA
    Posts
    664

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    rcc56: Thank you for a very informative post. I think your observation that every instrument is different even if made in the same month is worth keeping in mind. A quick first search has not shown me the tension on the strings you mentioned in your earlier post - bit I will find it (curiosity), I’m sure. Thanks again for the input.
    Last edited by Tim Logan; Jun-01-2020 at 5:17am.

    “There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats.” ― Albert Schweitzer

    1925 Lyon & Healy Model A, #1674
    2015 Collings A (MT2-V)

  14. #11
    Timothy Tim Logan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Shutesbury, MA
    Posts
    664

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    EVERYBODY, I ERRED ABOVE: the string gauges were from Just Strings AND I picked up incorrect tension data columns from the TI site earlier. Sorry! Here is the correct info. Tension figures are straight from:

    https://www.thomastik-infeld.com/en/...dolin/mandolin

    Thomastik mittels:
    .010 015 .021 .033
    17.4 15.4 15.4 15.4 (pounds)

    Thomastik stark;
    .011 .016 .022 .034
    21.8 18.7 17.6 17.6 (pounds)
    Last edited by Tim Logan; Jun-01-2020 at 5:13am.

    “There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats.” ― Albert Schweitzer

    1925 Lyon & Healy Model A, #1674
    2015 Collings A (MT2-V)

  15. #12
    Timothy Tim Logan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Shutesbury, MA
    Posts
    664

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    Although I do love the TI mittels, I cannot but help wanting to experiment with different strings on my L&H model A. However, I do not want to put an inappropriately high tension string on it. Just to be a bit neurotic, I’m going to ask this: it sounds like, from the comments above, that Dogal R92 (medium) .010. .015 .025 .037 strings would not be a problem. However, I do not know the tension and understand that their core material may contribute to the tension being disproportionately higher than the guage increase. Does anyone know for sure if the R92’s would be “safe” on the L&H? As always, thank you.

    “There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats.” ― Albert Schweitzer

    1925 Lyon & Healy Model A, #1674
    2015 Collings A (MT2-V)

  16. #13
    Timothy Tim Logan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Shutesbury, MA
    Posts
    664

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    Recently I took the TI's off my LH and strung it with GHS A250's. I like them better than the TI's MUCH to my surprise!

    “There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats.” ― Albert Schweitzer

    1925 Lyon & Healy Model A, #1674
    2015 Collings A (MT2-V)

  17. #14
    Registered User mandobassman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Delran, NJ
    Posts
    2,921

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    Quote Originally Posted by Martin Jonas View Post
    The difference in rated tension is pretty significant between the mittel and the starks. Flatwound strings can be tricky to compare as the gauge to string tension conversion is quite different compared to roundwounds.

    Martin
    Lots of people often make this mistake is comparing flatwounds to roundwounds. When comparing in just gauge, it's not apples to apples. Comparison must be made in tension. TI Starks are actually lighter in overall tension than D'Addario J-74 mediums.

    Also, I disagree with people's assessment that pre-war instruments need to be played with lighter strings. That may be true for many bowlbacks, but carved top mandolins are built to handle the tension. I had a 1924 Gibson A Snakehead for 20 years and it was always strung up with GHS Silk and Steel mediums. There are tons of '20s and '30s F2s and F4s with J-74's on them and they hold up just fine. I can't see where the L&H mandolins would be any different. In my opinion, the Thomastik Starks would be considered on the lighter side. No need for Mittels, unless you preferred the tone.
    Larry Hunsberger

    2013 J Bovier A5 Special w/ToneGard
    D'Addario FW-74 flatwound strings
    1909 Weymann&Sons bowlback
    1919 Weymann&Sons mandolute
    Ibanez PF5
    1993 Oriente HO-20 hybrid double bass
    3/4 guitar converted to octave mandolin

  18. The following members say thank you to mandobassman for this post:


  19. #15
    Registered User mandobassman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Delran, NJ
    Posts
    2,921

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    Quote Originally Posted by Tim Logan View Post

    Thomastik stark;
    .011 .016 .022 .034
    21.8 18.7 17.6 17.6 (pounds)
    The tension of the D'Addario J-74's are;

    E-23.2 A-19.2 D-23.3 G-25.1


    The total tension of the Thomastik starks is 75.7 pounds. The total tension of the D'Addario J-74 medium is 90.8 pounds. So, as you can see, the TI Heavy gauge is 15 pounds lighter than the J-74 medium guage. You can't compare just string gauge. There is no reason you can't use TI Starks on a L&H.
    Larry Hunsberger

    2013 J Bovier A5 Special w/ToneGard
    D'Addario FW-74 flatwound strings
    1909 Weymann&Sons bowlback
    1919 Weymann&Sons mandolute
    Ibanez PF5
    1993 Oriente HO-20 hybrid double bass
    3/4 guitar converted to octave mandolin

  20. The following members say thank you to mandobassman for this post:


  21. #16
    Timothy Tim Logan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Shutesbury, MA
    Posts
    664

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    Quote Originally Posted by mandobassman View Post
    The tension of the D'Addario J-74's are;

    E-23.2 A-19.2 D-23.3 G-25.1


    The total tension of the Thomastik starks is 75.7 pounds. The total tension of the D'Addario J-74 medium is 90.8 pounds. So, as you can see, the TI Heavy gauge is 15 pounds lighter than the J-74 medium guage. You can't compare just string gauge. There is no reason you can't use TI Starks on a L&H.
    Thank you. What I would really like to hear is the Dogal Calace mediums (10 15 25 37) but I don't trust myself using Graham McDonald's string tension calculator.

    “There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats.” ― Albert Schweitzer

    1925 Lyon & Healy Model A, #1674
    2015 Collings A (MT2-V)

  22. #17
    Mando-Accumulator Jim Garber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    30,753

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    It is very funny: the only mandolin on which I refer Thomastiks is my Washburn/L&H Professional. And I have liked them on mandolins that were specifically voiced for those strings like Phoenix Neo-Classical or German bowlbacks or flatbacks (Woll, Seifert and the like). I believe that JeffD uses them on his National RM-1 and I might try them on that since it has volume to spare and can use some taming. That tailpiece though is a real pain to change strings.
    Jim

    My Stream on Soundcloud
    Facebook
    19th Century Tunes
    Playing lately:
    1924 Gibson A4 - 2018 Campanella A-5 - 2007 Brentrup A4C - 1915 Frank Merwin Ashley violin - Huss & Dalton DS - 1923 Gibson A2 black snakehead - '83 Flatiron A5-2 - 1939 Gibson L-00 - 1936 Epiphone Deluxe - 1928 Gibson L-5 - ca. 1890s Fairbanks Senator Banjo - ca. 1923 Vega Style M tenor banjo - ca. 1920 Weymann Style 25 Mandolin-Banjo - National RM-1

  23. #18
    Timothy Tim Logan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Shutesbury, MA
    Posts
    664

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Garber View Post
    It is very funny: the only mandolin on which I refer Thomastiks is my Washburn/L&H Professional. And I have liked them on mandolins that were specifically voiced for those strings like Phoenix Neo-Classical or German bowlbacks or flatbacks (Woll, Seifert and the like). I believe that JeffD uses them on his National RM-1 and I might try them on that since it has volume to spare and can use some taming. That tailpiece though is a real pain to change strings.
    I felt the same with my L&H and Phoenix as well. Lately though my tastes seem to be changing. I like the GHS A-250 e-string, for example, much better than the TI. However, that doesn't really make sense to me because I think the e-strings are pretty much identical. It must be the effect of the overall tension change on the mandolin when changing to a different thickness for the lower strings and a different winding. There's also always the chance that I am "BS'ing"myself - kind of like the way people may talk about bottles of wine LOL! But I don't think so.
    Last edited by Tim Logan; Dec-19-2020 at 6:43pm.

    “There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats.” ― Albert Schweitzer

    1925 Lyon & Healy Model A, #1674
    2015 Collings A (MT2-V)

  24. #19
    Mando-Accumulator Jim Garber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    30,753

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    What is “AWS” and do they make a separate e-string?
    Jim

    My Stream on Soundcloud
    Facebook
    19th Century Tunes
    Playing lately:
    1924 Gibson A4 - 2018 Campanella A-5 - 2007 Brentrup A4C - 1915 Frank Merwin Ashley violin - Huss & Dalton DS - 1923 Gibson A2 black snakehead - '83 Flatiron A5-2 - 1939 Gibson L-00 - 1936 Epiphone Deluxe - 1928 Gibson L-5 - ca. 1890s Fairbanks Senator Banjo - ca. 1923 Vega Style M tenor banjo - ca. 1920 Weymann Style 25 Mandolin-Banjo - National RM-1

  25. #20
    Timothy Tim Logan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Shutesbury, MA
    Posts
    664

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    GHS A-250: typo

    “There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats.” ― Albert Schweitzer

    1925 Lyon & Healy Model A, #1674
    2015 Collings A (MT2-V)

  26. #21
    Mando-Accumulator Jim Garber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    30,753

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    Maybe you have something there—violinists often use one brand of strings for the lower three and a different one for the e-string. I stared using a Kaplan Non-Whistling e on my fiddle with Thomastik Vision strings for the others. Why not do that for a mandolin? Nothing wrong with experimenting.
    Jim

    My Stream on Soundcloud
    Facebook
    19th Century Tunes
    Playing lately:
    1924 Gibson A4 - 2018 Campanella A-5 - 2007 Brentrup A4C - 1915 Frank Merwin Ashley violin - Huss & Dalton DS - 1923 Gibson A2 black snakehead - '83 Flatiron A5-2 - 1939 Gibson L-00 - 1936 Epiphone Deluxe - 1928 Gibson L-5 - ca. 1890s Fairbanks Senator Banjo - ca. 1923 Vega Style M tenor banjo - ca. 1920 Weymann Style 25 Mandolin-Banjo - National RM-1

  27. #22
    Registered User bstanish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    13

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    I believe Caterina Lichtenberg uses Thomastiks and Hannabach ‘e’ strings on her setup. Trekel used to sell this as a package at one time. So there is some precedence for mixed string the way violinists are known to do.

  28. #23
    Innocent Bystander JeffD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    24,807
    Blog Entries
    56

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Garber View Post
    I believe that JeffD uses them on his National RM-1 and I might try them on that since it has volume to spare and can use some taming. That tailpiece though is a real pain to change strings.
    I did for a while, on someone's advice. I thought they changed the tone of the RM-1 too much though, so I went back to the John Pearse strings.
    A talent for trivializin' the momentous and complicatin' the obvious.

    The entire staff
    funny....

  29. #24
    Mando-Accumulator Jim Garber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    30,753

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    Quote Originally Posted by JeffD View Post
    I did for a while, on someone's advice. I thought they changed the tone of the RM-1 too much though, so I went back to the John Pearse strings.
    I changed the original mediums to Elixir lights on that mandolin. Maybe I will try my usual NBs though if and when I change the strings.
    Jim

    My Stream on Soundcloud
    Facebook
    19th Century Tunes
    Playing lately:
    1924 Gibson A4 - 2018 Campanella A-5 - 2007 Brentrup A4C - 1915 Frank Merwin Ashley violin - Huss & Dalton DS - 1923 Gibson A2 black snakehead - '83 Flatiron A5-2 - 1939 Gibson L-00 - 1936 Epiphone Deluxe - 1928 Gibson L-5 - ca. 1890s Fairbanks Senator Banjo - ca. 1923 Vega Style M tenor banjo - ca. 1920 Weymann Style 25 Mandolin-Banjo - National RM-1

  30. #25
    Timothy Tim Logan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Shutesbury, MA
    Posts
    664

    Default Re: Why do L&H Model A, B, & C owners use TI mittels and not star

    I finally made the move to Dogal Calace R92 mediums for my L&H. I wish I had done it sooner. Over time I have grown less enamored with TI's on the L&H. The R92's sound remarkable and for my current tastes are absolute perfect for this mandolin. Great, great sound.

    “There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats.” ― Albert Schweitzer

    1925 Lyon & Healy Model A, #1674
    2015 Collings A (MT2-V)

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •