So-- I'm pleased to say I had a chance to meet and play this lovely instrument tonight. #It is very handsome, as you can see in the photos, although we all know that photos don't always do justice to the 3-D experience. #Some visual features (hard to make out in the photos) that I think are particularly nice -- the white binding inside the soundhole, and a very sharp razor-thin pinstripe that runs along the inside of the binding all along the fretboard and headstock. #As others have said, the workmanship is top notch, the finish is flawless... and it has a nice Price tailpiece which I hadn't had a chance to see "in person" before, and which is a terrific piece of work. #It has a very nice, slender neck profile (much like the Trillium and Dean) so is easy on smaller hands... has a sleek feel to match the sleek look.
Sound-wise... it is hard for me to figure out how to talk about it (or even hear it) without comparing it to my OM (the Dean)... and we both played both OM's, and pretty much agreed that they are different but equally great instruments. #In guitaristic terms, the Dean is more like a dreadnaught-- with more body (actually physically bigger and deeper) and a deeper, boomier overall tone. #The Arches is more like an auditorium style guitar... with a somewhat stringier, more sparkly tone with more articulated trebles than the Dean. #We also both noticed that the differences sound more exaggerated to the player's ear than when listening from out in front of the instruments. #The Dean is a bit louder but the Arches does not lack for volume or power by any stretch.
Anyway... Judith is happy, and well she should be. #This is a noble instrument (as Stv would say), and suits her playing style well. #A good match.
Karen Escovitz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Otter OM #1
Brian Dean OM #32
Old Wave Mandola #372
Phoenix Neoclassical #256
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you might as well dance!
Bookmarks