Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 28

Thread: Strings; j-74 vs. j75's

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    250

    Default

    I'm thinking about stringing up with D'addario j75's. Has anyone made the switch? What were the results? Any problems with increased string tension? My mandolin is pretty lightly built. I would love to get a little fatter sound in the trebles. What about mixing gauges? Thanks for your input.

  2. #2
    Registered User Chip Booth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Hailey, ID
    Posts
    2,112

    Default

    I tried them once instead of the J74s I always use. They were just too stiff for me, and there was not much change in tone on that particular instrument, so I quickly switched back. It's only a 7$ experiment though, see what happens.

    Chip

  3. #3
    M@ñdº|¡ñ - M@ñdºce||º Keith Erickson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    El Paso del Norte, The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    2,333

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by (troika @ Jan. 17 2008, 12:33)
    I'm thinking about stringing up with D'addario j75's. #Has anyone made the switch? #What were the results? #Any problems with increased string tension? #My mandolin is pretty lightly built. #I would love to get a little fatter sound in the trebles. #What about mixing gauges? #Thanks for your input.
    I've had the best of results with J-74's. I love 'em so much I'm too chicken to change to anything else on my MK A+.
    Keith Erickson
    Benevolent Organizer of The Mandocello Enthusiast

  4. #4

    Default

    I've used both, and while I do find that the 74s are noticeably easier on my fingers, the 75s really bring out the tone and volume for me. I'm sticking with the 75s, though I'm partial to EXPs over the Js nowadays as the Js never lasted me very long and I'm not fond of frequent string changes.
    Jason

    "Aerodynamically the bumblebee shouldn’t be able to fly, but the bumblebee doesn’t know that so it goes on flying anyway."

    Newell A5 #37, Glenn F5 #66, Eastman 615 #537,

  5. #5
    Geoff Clarkson squirrelabama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Portland Oregon
    Posts
    324

    Default

    My favorite aspect of the 75's is the thicker treble strings. I tend to overdrive the 74's on any thing that has them on them. The treble notes themselves really bloom too. My next step is the exp's, as like jasonh, they never last that long. I have very caustic hand sweat!! Like anything, you'll get used to the larger guage sooner than you think, and your mando will open up more quickly with more tension on the top!!
    I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.

  6. #6
    Notary Sojac Paul Kotapish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Alameda, California
    Posts
    2,484

    Default

    I prefer the snap and punch I get with the J-75s. Just a crazy thousandth of an inch makes all the difference.
    Just one guy's opinion
    www.guitarfish.net

  7. #7
    Free Spirit Aran's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Dublin Ireland
    Posts
    616

    Default

    J75's have a fatter sound for sure...

    Having really liked the J75's over the J74's I also tried the Sam Bush Gibson Monel set and now after a second try of all 3 types I'm sticking to the Sam Bush set.

    As a bonus with Sam Bush set you get a spare A & E string.
    Mando: Weber Bitteroot

  8. #8
    Geoff Clarkson squirrelabama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Portland Oregon
    Posts
    324

    Default

    Aren't the Sam Bush strings even lighter guage than the 74's...in particular the A's?
    I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.

  9. #9
    Registurd User pjlama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Los Ranchos De Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    1,896

    Default

    I think the 75's are much fatter sounding and because they're stiffer I can really dig in.
    PJ
    Stanley V5

  10. #10
    Registered User 300win's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,507
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    J-75's made my mandolin sound a little richer, but the 74's are easier, I too also like the Sam Bush monos.

  11. #11
    Free Spirit Aran's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Dublin Ireland
    Posts
    616

    Default

    Yes Sam Bushe's a knats chuff thinner:
    Sam Bush Monels: 11 14 25 41
    J75's : 115 16 26 41



    Mando: Weber Bitteroot

  12. #12
    Registered User Kevin K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    West Tennessee
    Posts
    1,230

    Default

    J75's have a 26 on the D
    "Can I have a little more talent in the monitors please?"

  13. #13
    Moderator MikeEdgerton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Howell, NJ
    Posts
    26,933

    Default

    J-75's are louder and honestly I like the way they sound better on my F5G. The other side of the coin is that I play J-74's most of the time because I can pick them cleaner.
    "It's comparable to playing a cheese slicer."
    --M. Stillion

    "Bargain instruments are no bargains if you can't play them"
    --J. Garber

  14. #14
    Registered User Doug Hoople's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Wellington, NZ
    Posts
    1,140

    Default

    Believe it or not, I put the J75 A-string on my mando otherwise strung with J74. The J74 A-string features a lower string tension than the other strings, and suffers more from "end effect" tuning problems (where the string played open is in tune, but the notes in the lower frets tend to be sharp). I find that replacing the J74 A-string with the J75 A-string softens this "end effect" problem.
    Doug Hoople
    Adult-onset Instrumentalist (or was that addled-onset?)

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    101

    Default

    1 more for J75s
    Rick Smith

    Collings MF5 Deluxe V

  16. #16
    Closet Mandolin Player Mark Walker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Wayland, Michigan
    Posts
    1,552

    Default

    I've had both on my Silver Angel. #74's are a bit easier on the fingers; I get EXCELLENT sound with them but GREAT sound with 75's. #(Ken sends his mandolins out from his shop strung up with J75's.) #

    I suspect some instruments may not exhibit much difference with the strings; others will show a significant difference. #My PacRim Lotus sounds 'okay' with either; no noticable improvement with 75's on that mandolin. # JMHO #YMMV! #



    "The more I learn, the more I realize how ignorant I truly am..."

  17. #17
    Registered User swampstomper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Arnhem, the Netherlands; Nanjing, China; Ithaca NY USA
    Posts
    1,868

    Default

    One of my mandos I use the two J74 wound strings and heavier singles: 0.115 and 0.16: for the E and A. I got standard D'Addario plain steel guitar strings. I have a tailpiece that accepts ball ends, but you can take out the ball if necessary. The J75 wounds are just plain too stiff for my strength, but on that mando I need more projection and "bite" on the trebles. I tried the Sam Bush strings; again the wounds were fine but that wimpy 0.14 A just didn't work for me. And now I have that extra sitting around...

  18. #18

    Default

    J74s on one of mine and J75s on another.

    On the Gloucester I have J74s which sound great, but J75s just have no sparkle on that mando.

    On the other hand, the Bovier has a nice, beefy sound and very good chop with J75s. J74s don't sound as strong on that one.

    On all my flat tops I use light strings, usually sets with .010 for top E.

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    san diego
    Posts
    1,267

    Default

    Just so you know, I talked to Weber and they do not recommend J75 strings on their mandolins. They recommend only the J74 string range gauge but on any strings you like. 11 16 26 40 is what they say you should use.
    ntriesch

  20. #20
    Gilchrist (pick) Owner! jasona's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    2,933
    Blog Entries
    38

    Default

    I had mine set up with J74s and they sound great. I once tried J75s and the result was a muffled, closed, sound. J74s are what my mandolin asks for. I also Tried JS74s and they sound dead out of the package to me.
    Jason Anderson

    "...while a great mandolin is a wonderful treat, I would venture to say that there is always more each of us can do with the tools we have available at hand. The biggest limiting factors belong to us not the instruments." Paul Glasse

    Stumbling Towards Competence

  21. #21
    A.K.A. Scott Rule Daijoki's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    85

    Default Re: Strings; j-74 vs. j75's

    Nick wrote: "Just so you know, I talked to Weber and they do not recommend J75 strings on their mandolins. They recommend only the J74 string range gauge but on any strings you like. 11 16 26 40 is what they say you should use. "

    I wrote Weber asking about the J75s (after seeing that Jeff Austin uses them). They said I'd just need to adjust the truss rod.
    Last edited by Daijoki; Aug-29-2010 at 9:12am. Reason: Added original quote.

  22. #22
    Registered User Elliot Luber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Long Island, NY, USA
    Posts
    4,157

    Default Re: Strings; j-74 vs. j75's

    I switched from 74s to 75s because I find them much brighter (on my acoustic).

  23. #23
    Registered User 300win's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,507
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Strings; j-74 vs. j75's

    Went back to J-75's couple weeks ago. Got tired of replacing the Gibson sam Bush E and A courses with heavier gauge single strings. J-75's do make a big sound, very good tone, they just give out so fast.

  24. #24

    Default Re: Strings; j-74 vs. j75's

    Man, I feel so wimpy with my puny J73's. Hitting them with a heavy pick is probably a forum of bullying.

  25. #25
    Registered User Laird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Poultney, Vermont
    Posts
    892

    Default Re: Strings; j-74 vs. j75's

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug Hoople View Post
    The J74 ... suffers more from "end effect" tuning problems (where the string played open is in tune, but the notes in the lower frets tend to be sharp). I find that replacing the J74 A-string with the J75 A-string softens this "end effect" problem.
    I've never heard of this "end effect," and would have assumed the sharps on the lower frets were due to an intonation problem(misplaced bridge). How does this "end effect" work?

Similar Threads

  1. Strings
    By bottrane in forum Equipment
    Replies: 10
    Last: Oct-03-2007, 6:56pm
  2. J73 Strings
    By DryBones in forum Equipment
    Replies: 7
    Last: Jul-26-2006, 2:38pm
  3. Monel wound strings...Black strings....
    By levin4now in forum Equipment
    Replies: 24
    Last: Apr-10-2005, 1:10pm
  4. Anyone Tried These New Strings?
    By Onesound in forum Equipment
    Replies: 16
    Last: Apr-08-2005, 11:50am
  5. strings for a mid-mo
    By jus in forum Equipment
    Replies: 9
    Last: Aug-15-2004, 9:56pm

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •