"There just aren't enough people committed to backing up the laws, so market demand still rules instead"
The market will _always_ rule, regardless of laws which attempt to distort it.
Something about Adam Smith's "invisible hand", so they say.
I don't see too much difference between the pics posted and scenes from strip mining down Appalachia way.
It's a two-edged sword.
To some (usually those of us viewing from a distance) it conjures up "destruction".
To many of the local folks, however, what they see are... "jobs".
The awful reality is that whatever wood there is to be taken, is going to be taken -- if not by those who abide by CITES, then by others. Make something illegal, and often the demand for it _increases_. What is needed are more "managed areas" where the wood is harvested, but in controlled quantities, rather than "banned outright". The "mahogany farms" of Costa Rica are the right approach. This should be done with rosewood, as well.
Bans don't work with _other_ "controlled substances", and they ain't gonna work with wood, either.
As someone already mentioned, the amount of rare woods used for instrument building, vis-a-vis that which is used for [what musicians probably consider] "frivolous" purposes, is miniscule.
Indeed, if that wood is dwinding and eventually going to be gone, it's BETTER that it be used for such things as musical instruments, rather than floors, cabinets and furniture.
- John
Bookmarks