Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Pearl vs. bone

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Springfield, Il. & Eureka Springs, Arkansas
    Posts
    321

    Default

    What is the feeling of you builders and players alike.

    What is the tone and volume difference between bone and pearl in a mandolin nut.
    Adam F. Hardcastle
    Grandpaw
    1996 Custom McConnell F5 #004
    F5 Loar Clone #75875

  2. #2
    Registered User evanreilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Asheville, North Carolina
    Posts
    4,318

    Default

    I am going to toss in my favorite material: Fossil Ivory.
    In my experience, it is the best of the lot!

  3. #3
    Café habitué Paul Hostetter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Santa Cruz, California
    Posts
    6,286

    Default

    This one again. Too much of the FI I have encountered over the years has the consistency of blackboard chalk. Bad sound, temporary usefulness. It's not all like that, but enough is to make me avoid it. Bone is generally harder and more reliable. It's the standard for good reason. Pearl is a lot of work, but visually quite lovely, and arguably a hair better practically speaking. Real ivory is a bit too soft and rubbery. Great for gut and nylon strings, not so good for steel.
    .
    ph

    º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º
    Paul Hostetter, luthier
    Santa Cruz, California
    www.lutherie.net

  4. #4
    Registered User f5loar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Salisbury,NC
    Posts
    6,470

    Default

    Ole Lloyd seemed to prefer pearl nuts. Worked for him should work for others.

  5. #5
    Café habitué Paul Hostetter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Santa Cruz, California
    Posts
    6,286

    Default

    Actually, pearl nuts were a feature of all the top-of-the-line Gibsons before young Lloyd signed on. Pre-Loar model 4 instruments (F-4, TB-4, L-4, etc.) had pearl nuts. When the model 5 line was initiated, the 4s went to bone nuts and the 5s got to have the pearl nuts.
    .
    ph

    º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º
    Paul Hostetter, luthier
    Santa Cruz, California
    www.lutherie.net

  6. #6
    Registered User generankin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    CheeseLand
    Posts
    177

    Default

    Mr. Gerhardt put a pearl nut in my Custom Deluxe Phoenix: <http://obyank.fotopic.net/c594002_25.html>
    Gene R. Rankin (a CheeseHead)
    Phoenix custom Deluxe

  7. #7
    Certified! Bernie Daniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    8,347
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: Pearl vs. bone

    OK I do realize that this string is 8 years old -- but it is one that seemed close to the question at hand (the question I had at hand that is)!

    I bought a collection of shell pieces a while back on eBay and last night I selected a piece of MOP and made a new nut for an F-style mandolin that was fitted with a bone nut.

    The MOP was difficult material to work with but eventually I did come up with a pearl nut with dimensions very close to the original bone nut.

    When I tuned the mandolin up it does have (perhaps) a bit more projection or volume now but the sound also (especially the A & E courses) is also decidedly more "harsh". Its hard to explain but is sounds more raw and "jarring" and is not all that pleasing to the ear (at least my ear).

    For this mandolin at least this exercise has not been a success. I'm going to try filing a bit on the nut slots to see if there is a issue there but I am thinking later today the bone nut goes back in.

    I've heard people come done on both sides of the pearl versus bone nut am I correct in thinking the effects will be different with different mandolins? That is MOP will improve some but not others relative to bone?
    Bernie
    ____
    Due to current budgetary restrictions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off -- sorry about the inconvenience.

  8. #8
    Registered User sunburst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    15,888

    Default Re: Pearl vs. bone

    Bernie, what else did you change? Strings perhaps? String height (at either end)? Anything else? My point is, if anything else was changed, it may not be the nut material that is making the difference that you hear.

    My feelings:
    Pearl - Difficult to work, chips somewhat easily, sounds fine, looks more or less shiny, depending on angle of cut.
    Bone - Easier to work, doesn't chip easily, sounds fine, has a warm color and natural gloss when buffed.

    So the choice is between two materials that both sound fine but look different. One is harder to work with than the other, so the choice comes down to which look we prefer, and if we like the look of pearl better, is it worth the extra work?

  9. #9
    Certified! Bernie Daniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    8,347
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: Pearl vs. bone

    Quote Originally Posted by sunburst View Post
    Bernie, what else did you change? Strings perhaps? String height (at either end)? Anything else? My point is, if anything else was changed, it may not be the nut material that is making the difference that you hear.

    My feelings:
    Pearl - Difficult to work, chips somewhat easily, sounds fine, looks more or less shiny, depending on angle of cut.
    Bone - Easier to work, doesn't chip easily, sounds fine, has a warm color and natural gloss when buffed.

    So the choice is between two materials that both sound fine but look different. One is harder to work with than the other, so the choice comes down to which look we prefer, and if we like the look of pearl better, is it worth the extra work?
    Thanks for the thoughts!

    Answering your last question first - NO!

    The pearl was really hard to shape and it was close to total frustration trying to make a small indent to start filing. On bone I use a scalpel to make a small indent in the piece so I can start filing the groove. For the MOP I ended up locking the file in position with two small metal clamps that put on each side of where I wanted the notch.

    I tried to change nothing (or as little as possible) in terms of the set up. The strings were new and I just loosened them and pushed them back to the side while I made the pearl nut.

    On the sound -- I don't hear the harshness as much right now as the strings have worn in from 5 - 6 hours of playing so maybe some of it was new strings and the pearl nut brought out the "new string tanginess" more than bone? Or more likely my ears have adapted to the sound?

    Anyway it was my first and last experience with MOP nuts.
    Last edited by Bernie Daniel; Apr-07-2013 at 3:04pm.
    Bernie
    ____
    Due to current budgetary restrictions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off -- sorry about the inconvenience.

  10. #10
    coprolite mandroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Outer Spiral Arm, of Galaxy, NW Oregon.
    Posts
    17,126

    Default Re: Pearl vs. bone

    Pearls are little round things, unless cultured around something inserted in the Oyster.

    Oysters are not gregarious,
    never heard of someone being Oysterously obnoxious,
    writing about music
    is like dancing,
    about architecture

  11. #11
    Certified! Bernie Daniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    8,347
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: Pearl vs. bone

    Quote Originally Posted by mandroid View Post
    Pearls are little round things, unless cultured around something inserted in the Oyster...
    But is not the mother of a pearl a pearl? Just wondering.
    Bernie
    ____
    Due to current budgetary restrictions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off -- sorry about the inconvenience.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Pearl vs. bone

    Quote Originally Posted by mandroid View Post
    Pearls are little round things, unless cultured around something inserted in the Oyster.

    Oysters are not gregarious,
    never heard of someone being Oysterously obnoxious,
    Oysterously boisterous perhaps?

  13. #13
    formerly Philphool Phil Goodson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Statesville, NC
    Posts
    3,256

    Default Re: Pearl vs. bone

    I've got mandolins with bone, MOP, and FI.
    I can't hear any difference that can't be accounted for by other factors.
    They just need to be done well.
    Phil

    “Sharps/Flats” “Accidentals”

Similar Threads

  1. bone points
    By testore in forum Builders and Repair
    Replies: 1
    Last: Sep-16-2006, 9:49am
  2. Bone or MOP nut
    By Denny Lytle in forum Builders and Repair
    Replies: 11
    Last: Jun-21-2006, 7:14am
  3. Bone Nut
    By abelville in forum Looking for Information About Mandolins
    Replies: 1
    Last: Feb-24-2006, 8:55am
  4. Pearl nut vs bone/ivory saddle
    By mythicfish in forum Builders and Repair
    Replies: 8
    Last: Oct-12-2005, 12:03am
  5. MOP vs Bone Nuts
    By Scotti Adams in forum Builders and Repair
    Replies: 6
    Last: Sep-24-2004, 9:50pm

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •